Alerts

FDA advises consumers to stop using any supplement products labeled as OxyElite Pro or VERSA-1. Please see the following advisories: FDA -10/08/13, FDA - 10/11/13 and CDC - 10/08/13.

OPSS Hompage Button tall

Natural Medicines Homepage Button tall

Announcements

New article on reporting side effects of supplements
Just published in The New England Journal of Medicine: A recent article brings up dietary supplement issues you need to be aware of and discusses how dietary supplement side effects could be monitored better. A PDF of the April 3rd article is available free online.

3rd International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance
August 18-21, 2014
The ICSPP delivers innovative scientific programming on soldiers’ physical performance with experts from around the world.

DMAA list updated for April 2014

Fueling Performance Photo Campaign
Share photos of how you fuel your performance and be featured on our Facebook page!

Dietary supplement module
Earn continuing education credits (if eligible) for this two-hour online module.

Operation LiveWell

Performance Triad

hprc_slogan_banner.png

HPRC's human performance optimization (HPO) website is for U.S. Warfighters, their families, and those in the field of HPO who support them. The goal is Total Force Fitness: Warfighters optimized to carry out their mission as safely and effectively as possible.

You are here: Home Physical Fitness Questions from the Field The future of body armor

The future of body armor

From the Field

Will body armor be any lighter in the near future?

HPRC's Answer

Of course, we’d all like to believe that Batman’s light, flexible, bulletproof bodysuit is the wave of the future for military body armor. In fact, earlier this year the DoD released a Tech Report on reducing the weight of body armor for the military.1 This extensive study was a response to Congress’s question of how body armor weight can be reduced because of the possible disadvantages (injury, pain, fatigue, etc.) associated with service men and women carrying excessive amounts during deployments. In some cases, loads are more than double the recommended 50 lb limit. Because of these challenges, a new body armor design for women is being considered, in addition to other changes.2

The number one concern when developing body armor is the safety of the Warfighter. For this reason, body armor has two basic requirements: The ceramic plates cannot be penetrated when struck by multiple ballistic rounds in a well-defined shot pattern, and the backface deformation (indentation) that occurs when the bullet impacts the ceramic plate must be no greater than 44mm deep. Two major conclusions from the report are:

  1. The weight of body armor would have to be reduced by at least 10% for a wearer to notice and experience a significant difference. Currently, the technology just doesn’t exist to produce a “silver bullet” material that can reduce body armor weight enough without compromising Warfighter safety. While current armor is heavy, it does provide effective protection.
  2. Modular body armor could significantly reduce weight by allowing Warfighters to “customize” their armor for various threat environments. However, there are major practical issues such as having to stock large numbers of modular parts to both fit individual Warfighter physiques and provide appropriate levels of protection for the various threat levels. In addition, assessing threat so that body armor can be reduced in coverage or resistance when threat is low has its own challenges.

More research is needed into all the issues associated with body armor because of the large numbers of Warfighters being sent home from non-combat orthopedic injuries. In addition, there is indication that reducing the weight of body armor may increase the risk of injury or death because it would relieve soldier and unit performance degradation. In the meantime, the military is taking a more preventative approach to body armor and injury.